Hi Damon, >James Henstridge wrote: >> Would it make sense to seperate out the C code generator into a separate >> program? If you want a code generator that does not require X, this may >> be a better solution. The existing code generators show that it isn't >> really required to generate the source code. > >Yes, it probably would have been a better idea to do that. >But it would be a lot of work to change it. > >Damon Well, we all know that Glade is very good tool, but we all know too that it could be better. If it has a plugin-interface it would be very simple to make separate code generator, add new widget etc. The boys from GNOME-team are very good developers but they are very bad marketer. Powerful developing tool as improved Glade can be the magnet which attract new users to develop more and more application. And GNOME with plenty good staff will attract new end-users. In my opinion to develop Glade must be central effort to popularize GNOME. - Dorota, Witold i ...? +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line "unsubscribe glade-devel" in the body of the message.
