When you say glade2c, do you mean "glade to c", or does "2" imply "second
generation"? I definately feel that backwards compatibility must be
maintained, and that the new outputter should be an option. There will,
however, need to be some minor modifications to the main program to
accomodate the new outputter (see previous email).
John
> sound good, but a separate glade2c program (suggested by someone else) is
> the best thing to do (IMO)
> and then others can implement glade2py, glade2perl, glade2cc, glade2pas,
etc
> sergio
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the line "unsubscribe glade-devel" in the body of the message.
