Hi Tristan, On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 21:28, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> As you've noticed, the bulk of glade-3 development has been > emerging on the LIBGLADE_INTEGRATION branch and it makes > no sence for me to apply major patches to HEAD ATM. > Okay. I had no idea about LIBGLADE_INTEGRATION brach before so the patch was created from HEAD. > In light of the situation; I think the appropriate course of action is to > apply the anjuta changes to LIBGLADE_INTEGRATION (as you pointed > out on irc, it doesn't change much for your patch) and then turn our > focus to the libglade modifications that we are depending on. > Okay, I guess that means I should commit the patch in the branch. > Unfortunatly, that might not be fast enough for your beta release... > I dont really know what to say about that (and I wouldn't really call > glade-3 beta material yet either, the core codebase is rock-solid IMO, > only there are alot of annoying loose ends, like composite widget dialogs > that are a true pain to deal with). > That's fine. Anjuta beta release is just The Plan (tm). I am not even sure anjuta can make it either, but the point is to keep sticking on to it :-). Glade doesn't have to be released along with it, as the plugin will be conditionally compiled for now. I just wanted to have the option to demonstrate it to people interested in it. Thanks. Regards, -Naba _______________________________________________ Glade-devel maillist - Glade-devel@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/glade-devel
