On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 16:19 -0800, Fujinaka, Todd wrote: > I've been reading through the list and web pages to see if libglade > would be a good candidate for inclusion in Linux Standard Base (LSB). I > have a few quick questions though: > > Is libglade2 the current "stable" version? How long has the ABI been > stable? (I'm looking through the changelog, but I'm sure I've missed a > lot.)
libglade 2.0, 2.2, 2.4, 2.6 (though unfortunately 2.5.x is the latest version, for no good reason), (and maybe 2.8 today) are API/ABI-compatible with each other. It's most definitely as much a candidate for LSB inclusion as GTK+. However, the GTK+ team have plans to put equivalent API in GTK+ itself someday. You might want to ask on gtk-devel-list, to discover whether they think it's a good idea to wait for that. -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ Glade-devel maillist - Glade-devel@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/glade-devel
