On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 23:43 -0400, Tristan Van Berkom wrote: > >Just one issue: All abstract widget classes like GtkWidget, GtkBox, and > >GtkPaned, etc, are all trying to load icons, even though they shouldn't > >have one. We need to think of how to solve this, as a lot "Missing Icon" > >warnings are being logged as a result. The "widget_class->in_palette" > >flag used to prevent this, but it has since been removed. > > > > > Err, well "in_palette" isnt enough, menuitems need icons but > are not in the palette... the correct conditions to load an icon > is something like: > > if (G_TYPE_IS_INSTANTIATABLE (widget_class->type) && > G_TYPE_IS_ABSTRACT (widget_class->type) == FALSE) > > Also, any widget class that has a "generic_name" should have > an icon. >
Hi, Thanks for the solution, it does the trick! Also, since glade seems to be nearing release time, I think we should phase out the logging of "Missing Icon" warnings. I reason that many Gtk+ developers will not want to spend time creating icons for their custom widget catalogs. Some developers might not be very artistically inclined, or are only creating a custom catalog for a short-term project. So I propose that we include a "default" or "fallback" icon which will stand in for widgets with missing icons. What do you think? Should I go ahead with this? regards Vincent _______________________________________________ Glade-devel maillist - Glade-devel@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/glade-devel
