Am 15.11.2011 20:59, schrieb Tristan Van Berkom: > Denis, > Thanks for taking time to send this mail, it's good that we archive > this plan which we drafted in our irc session for future reference. > > Because this GBinding thing is turning out to be complex, what I really > want (and I think you might have missed that, sorry if I wasn't clear) is > an explanation of how recording sensitivity in the undo/redo stack > solves the GBinding branch problems.
Oh, I missed that indeed. My bad. The problem is that without recording sensitivity changes, we cannot cleanly detect property bindings that become invalid due to these changes and must be removed (or, at least, warned about). For instance, imagine that you bound some widget's property to the "label" property of a button (that is, "label" is the source). Now you change the type of the button's content from "Label" to "Custom Widget". Clearly, the binding makes no sense anymore - there is no label anymore to get a source value from. So setting the "label" property insensitive should have the side effect of removing the binding, undoably (that is, as a command). But there is no sensible place in the code to do this at the moment. If, on the other hand, there were a glade_command_set_property_sensitive(), that function could check for bindings that are going to become invalid and invoke further undoable commands to remove them. This would ensure that setting a property insensitive and removing all affected bindings is always a single, atomic, undoable operation. I hope this answers your question. Regards, Denis _______________________________________________ Glade-devel maillist - Glade-devel@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/glade-devel
