On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 17:05 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Juan Pablo Ugarte > <juanpablouga...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello guys > > > > Question for Tristan and Marco > > > > Is there any specific reason why we should keep external object in a > > different name space (other table) > > now that this is only for object and not any variable? > > They should ideally use the same hash (or namespace, as you put it). > > However it calls to question some nastier implications, such as... what > happens when you expose an external object which has the same > name as a declared object... should the external object be used instead ? > (i.e. should it be able to override internally declared fragments ?)
Right that would be a problem, in this case, if we expose the object before calling gtk_builder_add_from_string() for example then the external object will be overridden by the internal one. now if you expose the object after builder has already created an object then you can get a collision. gtk_builder_new () gtk_builder_add_from_string () gtk_builder_expose_object () gtk_builder_add_from_string () unless we make sure in gtk_builder_expose_object() that the table does not contain the same id we are trying to add > I think at least for now, we want to keep things as simple as possible > so the answer is no, it should not be able to override anything, and > a warning should be issued if there are any collisions in the internal > hash. Of course, btw for what I have seen in builder code if you call gtk_builder_add_from_string() more than once objects will get overridden in the table and bad thing would happen since the id checking is done at the parsing level. so I think that by simply making gtk_builder_expose_object() return a boolean value indication if the object was exposed or not would be ok. At least it wont be worst than the current situation greets Juan Pablo _______________________________________________ Glade-devel maillist - Glade-devel@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/glade-devel