i would chime in that the MacArthur Foundation this year made their photo content of fellows CC-BY-4.0, and i uploaded them to wikicommons http://www.macfound.org/creative-commons/
jim hayes On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Sarah Stierch <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jane, > > Ah..this is right up my alley. I know others will speak up about other > projects, but, the Walters Art Museum is a pet project that I am involved > with. They released over 20,000 CC licensed images, added the statement to > their website, and we uploaded them to WM Commons. We're in the process of > updating the case study I wrote a while back. You can find a link to it, > and get some basic info, here: > http://openglam.org/2013/01/22/walters-art-museum-a-case-study-in-sharing/ > > We're in the process of working with the Walters to license their metadata > CC0. We're SUPER close to getting the internal buy-in. I'm hoping we have > that set in stone and the license will be changed (right now it's CC BY) in > order for... the Walters hackathon, sponsored by Wikimedia DC and > emphasizing creative reuse. > > A second pet project that I am not as deeply involved in, but, am deeply > passionate about, is the work the Cooper-Hewitt has done in NYC. Their > metadata is CC0, they have a great knowledge-sourcing project with their > online colleges database where you can easily submit changes through > Zendesk, and tag any images or media related to the objects that you have > on Flickr, INstagram, etc and CH will list it on their collection page. > They also support using their collections on Wikipedia and provide you with > a citation to do so on each collections page. It will only get better once > the institution re-opens again. > > I also facilitate projects at the Smithsonian's Archives of American art > regarding a content donation - however, further content donations by mass > upload (i.e. not just a person going and taking a PD image off their > website and uploading it to Flickr or Commons) hasn't taken place recently, > that I am familiar with. > > Feel free to contact me with any direct questions! > > Sarah > > > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Jane Park <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi! I'm building a slide deck about CC and museums and cultural >> institutions, eg. GLAM. I want to populate it with the most compelling >> museum uses of CC and participatory/open methods for a US museum audience. >> Wondering if folks know of any new developments that are not already listed >> at https://wiki.creativecommons.org/GLAM ? >> >> Or of those that you do know of, what would you recommend highlighting >> more? >> >> I'm categorizing by 4 kinds of uses: >> 1. Sharing digital collections >> 2. Sharing collection records >> 3. Enabling artist choice >> 4. Engaging museum patrons/collaborations with community >> >> Appreciate any suggestions! >> >> Cheers, >> Jane >> -- >> Jane Park >> Creative Commons >> Los Angeles >> >> Make a donation to support CC in 2015: http://bit.ly/supportcc2015 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> GLAM-US mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam-us >> >> > > > -- > > Sarah Stierch > > ----- > > Diverse and engaging consulting for your organization. > > www.sarahstierch.com > > _______________________________________________ > GLAM-US mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam-us > >
_______________________________________________ GLAM-US mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam-us
