Well, before I could add my comments, the discussion was archived with "*The result of the discussion was:* *speedy keep* as being preliminarily nominated (see PKM's comment). No prejudice against renominating in several months if the categories remain empty."
Yours, Peaceray On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Paula Kate Marmor <[email protected]> wrote: > > I set up the categories for the new Newcomb Archives and Vorhoff Library > GLAM assessment table, and they've been nominated for deletion. Can people > please jump in and explain why we create these and they are unpopulated at > first? > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2014_December_16#Category:Newcomb_Archives_and_Vorhoff_Library-related_articles > ? > > Paula > > > > _______________________________________________ > GLAM-US mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam-us > >
_______________________________________________ GLAM-US mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam-us
