I beg to differ.
The Meinungsbild (German Wikipedia's equivalent to English Wikipedia's RfC)
was rejected based on formal grounds.
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meinungsbilder/Umgang_mit_bezahltem_Schreiben#Ergebnis
Although some users argued in favour of respecting NPOV and avoiding COI
edits, the substantial part of the Meinungsbild has mere informative
character.
In the end the result is a rejected Meinungsbild with inconclusive opinions
for or against certain aspects of paid editing and a status quo of the
existing COI policy
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Interessenkonflikt

Christoph

2015-04-22 13:42 GMT+02:00 Barbara Fischer <[email protected]>:

> Hello Sara,
>
> in Germany we suggest the staff should register with their institution and
> declare on their user page who they are. We had a year long project on
> paid editing
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:German_Wikipedia_WikiProject_on_How_to_deal_with_Paid_Editing>
> culminating in a request for comment. The result was, that paid editing is
> ok as long as the editor is respecting the neutral point of view
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view> and
> avoiding edits where conflict of interest
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest> would lure.
>
> kindly
>
> Barbara Fischer
> Kuratorin für Kulturpartnerschaften
>
> Jeweils persönlich von Montag bis Donnerstag für Sie erreichbar
> Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | NEU: Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 | 10963 Berlin
> Tel. (030) 219 158 26-(0)44
>
> http://wikimedia.de
>
> Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.
> Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter
> der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für
> Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.
>
> 2015-04-22 13:35 GMT+02:00 Axel Pettersson <[email protected]>:
>
>> Hi Sara,
>> I've worked with the Council of Central Museums in Sweden for a while
>> now, and a bunch of curators are both editing and engageing in discussions
>> during their work time. No concerns about employer oversight has been
>> raised, but rather that the transparency makes it easy to show off what
>> they have done. Beeing transparent also makes it easier for the wikimedia
>> community to see what GLAM staff are doing, and to help out when that is
>> needed and ask for expert input when sources, images or knowledge they
>> think the GLAM can provide is called for.
>>
>> Some of the museums have created institutional pages where they list
>> articles they are watching and working with, commons categories, projects
>> and users working on the GLAM. See
>> https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Projekt_GLAM/Tekniska_museet for
>> the Tekniska museet page.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> /axel
>>
>> ====================================
>> Axel Pettersson
>>
>>  +46 (0)730 59 58 13
>> [email protected]
>>
>> Twitter: @Haxpett <https://twitter.com/#%21/haxpett>
>> Blogg: http://haxpett.wordpress.com/
>>
>> 2015-04-22 12:46 GMT+02:00 Sara Thomas <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> Daria at WMUK suggested that I ask this list, hoping someone out there
>>> can help.  I'm a Wikimedian in Residence working at Glasgow Museums in
>>> Scotland.  We've had a lot of curator interest in editing and contributing
>>> to Wiki, but that's brought up some issues concerning the use of Wiki
>>> during working time, the oversight that the employer would have, etc.
>>> Glasgow Museums are part of Glasgow Life, which is a council-run body.
>>>
>>> I wondered if anyone had come up against these sorts of issues before,
>>> and if so, how they'd been dealt with?  I'm looking at ways in which
>>> curators can leave messages on talk pages, engage in discussion on
>>> Wikiprojects, etc, but some are really keen on direct editing.
>>>
>>> Any advice or experiences greatly appreciated!
>>>
>>> All the best,
>>> Sara Thomas
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GLAM/Museums_Galleries_Scotland
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> GLAM mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GLAM mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GLAM mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam
>
>
_______________________________________________
GLAM mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam

Reply via email to