Hi,

Do the already uploaded pictures have a unique id (or some metadata that could 
be used as such) that would allow for an easy matching between the images on 
Commons and the entries in the database?

Cheers,
Beat



From: GLAM [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arne Wossink
Sent: Montag, 11. Juni 2018 11:02
To: Wikimedia & GLAM collaboration [Public] <[email protected]>
Subject: [GLAM] GLAM collection transferred from Flickr

Hi all,

One of our GLAMs was working on a small upload of PD photos from their 
collection. They were planning to do the upload with Pattypan and use creator, 
language templates etc. to enrich the metadata as much as possible.

However, these photos were already available on their Flickr account under a PD 
license with basically the same information about the photos (description was 
limited anyway). Another user has recently transferred these with 
Flickr2Commons. So these images are now already on Commons, but their 
description and other information is not as good as could have been if all 
available templates etc. had been used.

This is a first for me. I'm aware that nothing could have been done about the 
Flickr to Commons transfer except not putting them there in the first place, 
but clearly the current situation is not in our best interest or that of the 
GLAM and is certainly not a best practice.

Any comments on this? What would be a good way to handle this situation?

Arne Wossink

Projectleider / Project Manager Wikimedia Nederland

(Werkdagen: maandag, dinsdag, donderdag / Office hours: Monday, Tuesday, 
Thursday)

Tel. +31 (0)6 11000505
E-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Post/bezoekadres:
Mariaplaats 3
3511 LH Utrecht
_______________________________________________
GLAM mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam

Reply via email to