On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 3:07 PM, James Heald <[email protected]> wrote: > While you're running the clean-up script to fix all the apostrophes, you > might also prefer the neater (and warning-free) {{PD-old-70-1923}} rather > than {{PD-US}}{{PD-old}} -- though in fact, for these images of 3D objects, > the license needed is surely {{Cc-zero}} or something similar, because there > needs to be some release of the photographer's copyright. Seconded here. Surely the objects are PD, but the photographs are definitely not, so you probably want to add the CC-zero template as well. It's a bit of a shame that the metadata isn't very clear on the license, but for now i guess just checking if the 'copyrightHolder' field is null or false is the best way forward. I did a little check and copyrighted works have a string in that field *and* the 'webImage' field is false (where PD works have an object there with image information).
Are you in contact with people from the Rijksmuseum by the way? If you want i could introduce you so they could have a look at the sample upload as well. And thanks so much for the project page describing the upload progress, i'll be adding those for the National Library / Archive uploads as well. -- Hay _______________________________________________ Glamtools mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools
