On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Lizzy Jongma <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, > > I restarted my upload on september 22nd: I started uploading approx 2600 > images with works of art depicting birds. Until 25th of september the images > were ingested into Wikimedia Commons (they were slowly dripping in) but over > the last two days no new images are ingested. Does anyone knows what went > wrong/why the upload stopped (again) and how I can restart my job? > > I also have difficulties estimating how many images and which images were > ingested: which log can I check? I can’t find the relevant log to see what > was uploaded or what problems were reported etc. > > Thank you very much for your help. > > best wishes > Lizzy Jongma
The logs for you in particular are at https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=gwtoolset&user=LizzyJongma&page=&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&uselang=en If you want the list in xml or json format, you can do https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=logevents&letype=gwtoolset&leuser=LizzyJongma&lelimit=max&format=jsonfm . See the api docs for details. In particular leaction can be used to filter by success/failure, and you need to use lecontinue parameter to get the next page of results. There are several entries that appear to be "skipped" due to the image existing already in commons. The records numbers are in the 2800's (The record numbers will skip around a bit, but should very roughly go from low to high in order), so if you only have about 2600 images, I would guess that a the tool went through all the images It seems like that perhaps the xml file has the same filename for several images. For example https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Inhoudsopgave.jpeg is marked as being replaced by a second image after your initial upload, and in the log, it looks like record 2815 was going to replace that image a third time, except someone had edited that page in the meantime ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Inhoudsopgave.jpeg&diff=173165602&oldid=173147674 ), so gwtoolset failed instead of silently overwriting I also notice several of the templates and file names have question marks in them. If the ? is unintentional, that might represent issue with charset conversions possibly. GWtoolset is still quite rough around the edges, especially for showing progress and explaining what happened in case of errors. -- -Brian _______________________________________________ Glamtools mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools
