Ideally it should differentiate between editing the file and editing the 
categories of the file.

If the upload is simply a better version of the same thing then very few 
categories will change.


> On 18 Dec 2015, at 11:35, Fæ <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> This is a good option for how GWT should handle "upgrades". Where
> other volunteers have edited it makes sense to tidy these up manually
> or by on-project negotiation.
> 
> As an example, many of the 100,000 Wellcome images I uploaded were
> plate illustrations, and I did go through a process of uploading
> higher resolution images after initial batch testing. Some users
> prefer to crop off the borders before they are used on Wikipedia or
> elsewhere, and so there were instances where I had to make a judgement
> call on whether to upload under new file names after such crops were
> created. Similarly on a couple of my projects I have uploaded both
> jpeg files and TIFF equivalents, sometimes at higher resolution or
> without the compression degradation that jpeg causes; though there
> have been several discussions about whether we should delete the jpegs
> as duplicates we have always ended up keeping both formats.
> 
> With these sorts of questions, although Commons has some relevant
> guidelines for overwriting files and handling duplicates, it's a good
> idea for very large upload projects to maintain its own guidelines +
> casebook on an on-wiki project page where interested volunteers can
> contribute views and ideas for how to manage housekeeping issues or
> exceptional cases. None of this, I believe, can be simply resolved
> with one shared GLAM manual with one way of working.
> 
> Fae
> 
>> On 18 December 2015 at 10:06, Hans Muller <[email protected]> wrote:
>> @Arne and experts:
>> We can overwrite a file with GWToolset provided no other user has edited
>> the file. Perhaps experts are aware of further options with GWT for
>> overwriting files.
>> 
>> Examples:
>> 1. GWToolset overwriting with a different resolution succeeded for
>> 
>>   
>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Naturalis_Biodiversity_Center_-_RMNH.MOL.216645_1_-_Ziba_annulata_%28Reeve,_1844%29_-_Mitridae_-_Mollusc_shell.jpeg
>> 
>> checking the box "Reload media from URL" down the page. The new resolution
>> is considered a new version. (Here a downgrade as a test.) The old version
>> remains available.
>> 
>> 2. GWToolset overwriting failed for
>> 
>>   https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Naturalis_Biodiversity_Center_-
>>>> _RMNH.MOL.216649_-_Mitra_aurantia_aurantia_%28Gmelin,_1791%29_-_Mitrida
>>>> e_-_Mollusc_shell.jpeg
>> 
>> with or without that box checked because
>> 
>>  "A media file with the identical title "File:Naturalis Biodiversity
>> Center - RMNH.MOL.216649 - Mitra aurantia aurantia (Gmelin, 1791) -
>> Mitridae - Mollusc shell.jpeg" already exists in the wiki. It was edited
>> or created by someone other than you"
>> 
>> - another user had edited the categories.
>> 
>> Best regards, hans muller
>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Hansmuller
>> 
>> Op Do, 17 december, 2015 12:39 pm schreef Arne Wossink:
>>> @Hans,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks for the input so far. Please keep me updated on that overwrite. If
>>> anything, it is once again a reminder that these things must be done
>>> right the first time around ;)
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Arne Wossink
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Projectleider / Project Lead Wikimedia Nederland
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Tel. +31 (0)6 11000505
>>> (di, wo, do)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> *Postadres*:                                                 *
>>> Bezoekadres:*
>>> Postbus 167                                                Mariaplaats 3
>>> 3500 AD  Utrecht                                         Utrecht
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 2015-12-17 12:34 GMT+01:00 Hans Muller <[email protected]>:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> We're talking about
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Media_contributed_by_Museum
>>>> _Catharijneconvent
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ? Main uploader there was HuskyBot i think.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I made a mistake some months a go while uploading photographs of dead
>>>> bird skins for Naturalis with GWToolset with various views for the same
>>>> specimen uploaded under the same filename. So that is like uploading a
>>>> higher resolution, an image with a different checksum under the same
>>>> name. You see the result here:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Naturalis_Biodiversity_Center_-
>>>> _RMNH.AVES.101712_-_Corvus_enca_compilator_Richmond,_1903_-_Corvidae_-_
>>>> bird_skin_specimen.jpeg
>>>> 
>>>> (scroll down)
>>>> Later uploads under the same filename by GWToolset were accepted as new
>>>> versions. Caveat: the uploader was the same user for these various
>>>> "versions".
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Best regards, hansmuller
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> PS At the end of my present batch (18/12 morning?) GWToolset is
>>>> requested to overwrite medium resolution
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Naturalis_Biodiversity_Center_-
>>>> _RMNH.MOL.216649_-_Mitra_aurantia_aurantia_%28Gmelin,_1791%29_-_Mitrida
>>>> e_-_Mollusc_shell.jpeg
>>>> 
>>>> with large, so we'll see. I can put up a test image to test if another
>>>> GWToolset user can overwrite
>>>> it (?). I don't think so, this might be Arnes problem.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Op Do, 17 december, 2015 11:30 am schreef Jesse de Vos:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Arne,
>>>>> I actually don't think this can be done. It is an action in which an
>>>>> existing file on Commons must be updated, this is not supported by the
>>>>> toolset. We had a similar issue with higher res. Video files. We
>>>>> decided to stick with the current resolution. Alternatively, a
>>>>> volunteer could do this update using a script. Best, Jesse
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> verzonden vanaf mijn smartphone|sent from my smart phone Op 17 dec.
>>>>> 2015
>>>>> 11:03 schreef "Hans Muller" <[email protected]>:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Dear Arne,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Yes, this is a modest batch that can be done with the GW toolset,
>>>>>> most easily if the images each have a (temporary) individual URL and
>>>>>> so are accessible on the internet.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Groeten, hans muller
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Op Do, 17 december, 2015 10:57 am schreef Arne Wossink:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Museum Catharijneconvent has approached us that they would like
>>>>>>> to make higher-resolution versions available of images that are
>>>>>>> already available on Commons. Around 800-1500 images are involved.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Is this something that can be handled by the GW toolset, or are
>>>>>>> there better ways to do this?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Arne Wossink
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Projectleider / Project Lead Wikimedia Nederland
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Tel. +31 (0)6 11000505
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> *Postadres*:                                                 *
>>>>>>> Bezoekadres:*
>>>>>>> Postbus 167
>>>>>>> Mariaplaats
>>>>>>> 3
>>>>>>> 3500 AD  Utrecht                                         Utrecht
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Glamtools mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Glamtools mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Glamtools mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Glamtools mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Glamtools mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Glamtools mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> [email protected] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
> Personal and confidential, please do not circulate or re-quote.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Glamtools mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools

_______________________________________________
Glamtools mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools

Reply via email to