> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 2 08:05:35
1997
> Resent-Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Old-Received: from lionsden.informatik.uni-muenchen.de by vanuata with SMTP
(MMTA) with ESMTP; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 08:05:26 +0100
> Old-Received: from tahiti.pms.informatik.uni-muenchen.de
(tahiti.pms.informatik.uni-muenchen.de [129.187.214.96])
by lionsden.informatik.uni-muenchen.de (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP
id JAA22695 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Thu, 2 Oct 1997 09:05:23 +0200 (MESZ)
> Old-Received: from liesl.pms.informatik.uni-muenchen.de by
tahiti.pms.informatik.uni-muenchen.de with
SMTP (1.38.193.4/16.2) id AA10927; Thu, 2 Oct 1997
09:05:22 +0200
Sven Panne on:
> > [...] sh: 16173 Memory fault(coredump) [...]
> You didn't tell which ghc version you used for compilation, but anyway
> here is my guess if you used 0.29: I had the same problem here: hsc
> built without any sign of trouble, but when it was used to compile the
> libs, it coredumped.
Sorry: yes, you're right, twas 0.29. I'll try again later with either
2.02, which built fine, just to be confusing, or with your kindly-
offered later versions.
Juan Jose Quintela:
> I am sorry, but I press the repply button and I don't read the response
> address. Teh problem appears to be that I obtain the following
> "repply" adresses:
Indeed, I think it's a problem with the list, not with your message,
Juan; I think a similar problem was mentioned before. Seems to me
axiomatic that list-servers shouldn't generate addresses in headers
that will make them ill if they're replied too. ;-)
Cheers all,
Alex.
