Juan Jose Quintela quotes me quoting Simon...
> > > GHC 2.07 definitely does compile with 0.29,
> > > including the happy-related bits. The happy sources in the tree will
> > > compile with 0.29, and Happy can be told to generate 0.29-compatible
> > > parsers by giving it the -1.2 flag (this flag is used automatically by
> Yes, but the problem is that the Parser.hs that cames with the sources
> of ghc-2.07 is not ghc-0.29 friendly (it has newtype declarations) and you
> can't compile another Parser.hs becouse you dont have happy, and so on ...
I think it's more subtle than that. I _did_ already have a 1.3-style
version of happy, and remaking Parser.hs with it availed me naught.
Maybe I flubbed the flags myself when I did it though, I can't recall
exactly what sequence I tried to hack my way around by.
BTW, I got three copies of the above message, which is (at least ;-)
one too many. Is the list playing up again when replies get sent to
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"?
Administrivially,
Alex.
