> that doesn't look too good, if a little bit odd since we're compiling
> 3.00 on linux boxes here (2.0.30 kernels mostly.)
>
> To make sure that this is a ghc problem, could you try repeating the
> `make all' and see if you're getting the same crash? i.e., want to
> make sure we're into `normal' sig 11 problems (see
> http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11/ )
Well, I compiled ghc 3.00 on another linux box and it worked (and
worked and worked) ok. I am affraid it might be sig11.
It was a false alarm about ghc 3.00. I am soryy.
Bo"stjan :-)
