> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 28 11:48:59
1997
> This is another file missing from the source distribution. The new
> one is now up, and it contains all the necessary files.
Can you put this up as a patch, too?
> It does for me - but the sense of the link is reversed (i.e. now ghc
> points to ghc-2.09, which is the real driver).
Odd. It doesn't seem to do this at all for me. There's no "ghc-2.09",
and "ghc" isn't a link. I can't see where in the makefile this should
be happening, either, but as I said, ah dinnae ken GHC makefiles...
> This is so that you
> can install the new version over the older version.
Why not make it a "hard" link, in the same directory, thereby making
the point of which one is the real one moot?
Cheers,
Alex.
