Hello!
On Tue, Dec 01, 1998 at 10:38:32AM -0800, Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor) wrote:
> Felix Schroeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Try to create a fresh source tree, since it looks as if you've
> > > got "old" sources hanging about in yours (i.e., Literal is no
> > > more, it's Const these days.)
I've done that, and that has indeed solved the problem.
But why didn't cvs delete those source files, when updating a
3.0x source tree fetched via cvs to 4.01-current via
cvs up -Pd -rnew-rts?
> > I'll try that. But I thought, even if I have a stale source file,
> > the Makefiles shouldn't refer to it, so they should not compile
> > that file any more.
> They could do that, but it would be painful to maintain (IMHO),
> [...]
Understood.
Kind regards,
Felix.
