> > Picking up the wrong "ghc", perhaps?
> >
>
> Hard to tell - what does 'ghc --version' report?
4.01 (which wasn't what I had intended, btw, and Simon has already
avised is a Bad Idea -- more inter-machine configuration confusion
on my part, sorry).
What puzzled me was that it was just invoking "ghc", whereas for
some reason I was expecting config to have selected ghc-<some version>.
I may be misrembering what happened with previous versions, though
(or else I configured differently).
Anyhoo, reconfig with --with-ghc-hc=ghc-3.02, all seems well. Actually
getting someplace now, it looks like!
(Thanks for the help, especially to Simes, at the risk of tempting fate...)
Slan,
Alex.
