In message <8B57882C41A0D1118F7100805F9F68B50C44A8FB@RED-MSG-45>, Simon Marlow
writes:
>> Note that I'm barely able to write Haskell at all, so this may not be
>> very good. All that's required to generate the bug is to run with no
>> args. Or any args. Whatever. It does _NOT_ appear to be a GC
>> error. Anyways, here's the code:
>
>I haven't been able to take a look at this yet, but one possible cause is
>that you appear to be using gcc 2.5.6 - it would probably be worth upgrading
>to 2.7.2 (or even 2.8.1 or egcs if you use the latest ghc sources from CVS).
Given that I didn't compile this (I downloaded the binaries from the GHC
site), I'm not sure how my version of gcc is relevant.
Doesn't this version of ghc go to assembly?
-Robin
