Quite right. I've fixed this, so that it reports an error.
Simon
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, August 15, 1999 10:08 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: (a:b:)
>
>
> ghc-4.04 parses (a:b:) as ((a:b):), where the report says that this
> is ill-formed.
>
> Hmm, it is convenient in (a++b++)...
>
> --
> __("< Marcin Kowalczyk * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://kki.net.pl/qrczak/
> \__/ GCS/M d- s+:-- a22 C+++>+++$ UL++>++++$ P+++
> L++>++++$ E-
> ^^ W++ N+++ o? K? w(---) O? M- V? PS-- PE++
> Y? PGP->+ t
> QRCZAK 5? X- R tv-- b+>++ DI D- G+ e>++++ h!
> r--%>++ y-
>
