Bonard What this says is that GHC2.04 gives different output for fft2 than did some earlier version of GHC. The numbers involved are rather small and I really don't know which of the two is (closer to being) correct! If anyone has a C version, or is better with floats than me, it would be delightful to either declare GHC2.04 correct, or fix the bug if there is one. Help welcomed! Simon | I've made several attempts to run the nofib suite under the x86-linux ports of | ghc (versions 0.29 and 2.04). It has run well, except for some floating | point code. For example, the output of fft2: | | expected stdout not matched by reality | *** fft2.stdout Mon Jan 8 15:04:40 1996 | --- /tmp/runtest15948.1 Wed Jul 2 23:04:10 1997 | *************** | *** 1,3 **** | ! result1 = 2.6734264806727734e-12 | ! result2 = 2.6734264806727734e-12 | ! result3 = 4.8316280754079344e-8 | --- 1,3 ---- | ! result1 = 2.6519392517661656e-12 | ! result2 = 2.6519392517661656e-12 | ! result3 = 4.829263389183325e-8 | make: *** [runtest_fft2] Error 1 | | Any info would be most appreciated and a very warm thanks to the Glasgow team | for such an excellent system!
Re: Has anyone run fft2 successfully on linux?
Simon L Peyton Jones Thu, 3 Jul 1997 17:23:01 +0200 (MET DST)
- Has anyone run fft2 successfully on linux? Bonard B. Timmons III
- Re: Has anyone run fft2 successfully on linux? Simon L Peyton Jones
- Re: Has anyone run fft2 successfully on lin... Matt Donadio
