Sven Panne ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] might be the more appropriate list.
A reader of that list asked me explicitly not to
send it to that list because he thought it wasn't
appropriate to sent cvs-bug messages to that list:-)
I'll send further error messages to cvs-ghc in the future.
It does seem to be more appropriate.
: Could you send a (small) program exhibiting *what* is broken?
: Guessing one of the many numerical operations on Integers is a
: little bit hard... :-)
[see below]
: > I decided to rebuild because of an email from yesterday that
: > suggested that gcd had been improved---but I may have understood
: > this incorrectly.
:
: GCD on Int/Integer now uses the GMP lib, not the generic version for
: Integral types. Furthermore, compile-time constant folding in general
: has been improved (or broken by me :-} since 4.06, so it could be a
: bug there, too, so an example would really be helpful.
Sending a small program will be very difficult. the next email
I'll send to you will be a tarball with instructions of how to
generate an example which produces wrong output.
I've spent too much time on this in the past and am too bussy
to have alook at it myself at the moment. Sorry about that.
Regards,
Marc
