17 Jul 2000 20:12:47 -0700, Martin Pokorny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> Perhaps I'm still too much the novice to see an error on my part,
> but the code seems to be valid Haskell to me.
It is valid. It's indeed the error in 4.08 others mentioned, occuring
at least when contexts of class methods form a cycle of classes.
Simon Peyton Jones has already fixed it in the CVS version.
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk * [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/
\__/ GCS/M d- s+:-- a23 C+++$ UL++>++++$ P+++ L++>++++$ E-
^^ W++ N+++ o? K? w(---) O? M- V? PS-- PE++ Y? PGP+ t
QRCZAK 5? X- R tv-- b+>++ DI D- G+ e>++++ h! r--%>++ y-
