Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
>
> It's a bug all right, and a bizarre one at that.
> It's fixed in the before-ghci-branch.
> I'm not quite certain when it got fixed, mind you!
>
> Hmm. Maybe we're going to need 4.08.2.
The trouble with all this wondrous new GHC code is that one suspects that it has
fixed many of the old bugs by introducing lots of NEW ones. Have you tried
compiling UniForM (now up to 48000 lines of Haskell) with GHC lately?
I stopped trying to compile GHC from CVS ages ago when I was getting unexplained
core dumps which apparently could only be fixed by reinstalling gcc/binutils . . .
I would appreciate it if the two bugs I've reported in the last two days were
fixed, but I wonder where on earth this is going. Is the idea to keep on producing
4.08.* patches until you're finally confident enough with the head branch
of the CVS repository to turn it into a proper release?
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs
