Re: Syntax for implicit parameters

[Jeffrey R. Lewis]

Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:

> I only added 'with' because I did not want to steal *two* new keywords.
> One is bad enough!   I proposed using 'let' (not dlet), with the '?' to
> distinguish dynamic from lexical bindings, but did not achieve
> consensus.
>

I only added `with' to GHC originally because `dlet' was essentially deprecated 
(although I never bothered to remove it from hugs).

>
> Lack of consensus => the status quo stays.
>
> My order of preference:
>
> 1. [happy]. Use 'let'
> 2. [consent].  Use 'dlet' or 'with'
> 3. [hate]  Use both 'dlet' and 'with'
>
> Would the Hugs folk be willing to adopt (2)?

That would certainly be fine by me.

--Jeff


_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs