> Good point. It would be better as
>
> In the definition of "glue"
>
> (i.e. leave out 'function')
>
> I also think you are probably right about replacing single-quotes with
> double-quotes. It's easily done (one function, called
> "quotes"). Does
> anyone dissent? It'll cause loads of gratuitious test-suite
> differences,
> mind you, so we should do it at a stable moment.
I think there are several places that don't use the 'quotes' function
unfortunately, but this will be a good opportunity to make it
consistent.
I quite like the `' style of quoting, but it depends on the font.
Actually, if we're going to do this, we might as well go all the way and
colourise our error messages or at least embolden keywords, depending on
terminal support of course.
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs
