Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: [snip] > Luckily, there is a workaround (discovered by Tom Moertel on > #haskell). If you include field names in the data > definition for which you derive Show and Read, it seems to > work fine. [snip] Thanks. I may try this, if I get time. _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs
- Re: ghc5.04.1 deriving Read/Show broken Manuel M T Chakravarty
- RE: ghc5.04.1 deriving Read/Show broken George Russell
- RE: ghc5.04.1 deriving Read/Show broken Simon Marlow