Bugs item #668705, was opened at 2003-01-15 20:12
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108032&aid=668705&group_id=8032

Category: None
Group: 5.04.2
>Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 8
Submitted By: Antony Courtney (antonyc)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: hsc2hs broken under Win32

Initial Comment:
Hi,

hsc2hs seems to be broken under Win32 with ghc 
5.04.2.  If I take a simple test program and attempt to 
compile it with hsc2hs, I get the following output:

$ make -f Makefile.ghc-win32
hsc2hs Test.hsc
Test_hsc_make.o(.text+0x2d8):Test_hsc_make.c: 
undefined reference to `_imp___iob
'
Test_hsc_make.o(.text+0x305):Test_hsc_make.c: 
undefined reference to `_imp___iob
'
Test_hsc_make.o(.text+0x31b):Test_hsc_make.c: 
undefined reference to `_imp___iob
'
Test_hsc_make.o(.text+0x348):Test_hsc_make.c: 
undefined reference to `_imp___iob
'
Test_hsc_make.o(.text+0x373):Test_hsc_make.c: 
undefined reference to `_imp___iob
'
Test_hsc_make.o(.text+0x3a0):Test_hsc_make.c: more 
undefined references to `_imp
___iob' follow
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [Test.hs] Error 1

antony@AIRSTREAM ~/src/haskell/ffi/hsc2hs
$


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Simon Marlow (simonmar)
Date: 2003-01-20 17:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=48280

Reopened; there appear to be some problems with hsc2hs in 
a standard Windows installation of GHC.

What we've discovered:

 - By default, hsc2hs on windows uses "ghc" as the C
   compiler, and $(WhatGccIsCalled) as the linker, where
   $(WhatGccIsCalled) is set at build time and appears to
   be c:\mingw\bin\gcc on a system we tried it on, but
   might be set to "gcc" in the Windows installer distribution.

 - What we think ought to happen is that the default C
   compiler should be set to whatever GHC is installed
   with this version of hsc2hs, and the linker should
   also be set to the same thing, or at the least should
   point to the gcc installed along with your GHC.

We don't have a suitable test framework set up to make this 
change now, but it ought to be addressed before the next 
release.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Antony Courtney (antonyc)
Date: 2003-01-17 18:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=689194

If you look at the above output, you will see that it never gets 
as far as using any ".c files that are compiled seperately".  
The link errors that are reported are directly from hsc2hs 
attempting to compile, link and execute the .c file it produces 
internally (which emits a Haskell source file).

Nevertheless, it turns out that using the --ld=ghc option did 
the trick.  Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.

(GHCers:  Is there some reason to use default values of cc 
and ld that are inconsistent?)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Sigbjorn Finne (sigbjorn)
Date: 2003-01-17 17:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=232905

Yes, I did. Better make sure you also use 'ghc' as your 'gcc' 
if you're compiling up any .c files separately.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Antony Courtney (antonyc)
Date: 2003-01-17 17:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=689194

Thanks for the suggestion, Sigbjorn, but did you actually try 
it?  I get exactly the same output regardless of whether or not 
I use the --cc=ghc option.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Sigbjorn Finne (sigbjorn)
Date: 2003-01-17 16:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=232905

C compiler mismatch;  use hsc2hs with the option --cc=ghc 
for better results.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108032&aid=668705&group_id=8032
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs

Reply via email to