On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 11:53 +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: > On 25 July 2005 02:25, Duncan Coutts wrote: > > > The :tags for ghci feature that recently went into cvs: > > > > http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cvs-ghc/2005-June/025436.html > > > > means that unfortunately saying: > > > >> t blah > > > > now complains that :t is ambiguous because it could be :tags or :type. > > > > I think this may upset people! :-) People are very used to using :t. > > They've probably been doing it for more than a decade (with hugs > > before ghci). Could :tags be renamed or the ambiguity be resolved by > > letting :t default to the one that we obviously mean. > > I fixed this by renaming :tags to :etags and :ctags.
Ok, great. > Maybe you've got an old set of sources? Must have. Sorry for the noise. Duncan _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list Glasgow-haskell-bugs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs
