On 13 August 2005 08:21, Frederik Eaton wrote:
> Has runghc been fixed to not require scripts to have a ".hs" suffix?
> It looks to me like it hasn't, in the recent 6.4.1 snapshot, but I may
> be overlooking some option.
Right, this won't be in 6.4.1 I'm afraid. It required some larger
changes to GHC's front end (basically implementing gcc's -x option).
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs
