On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 01:04:41PM +0100, Sven Panne wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 1. Februar 2007 14:56 schrieb GHC:
> >
> > Fixed. Patch to merge (from 6.6 to HEAD):
> >
> > {{{
> > Thu Feb 1 13:53:33 GMT 2007 Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > * fix memory leak in allocExec/freeExec (see bug #985)
> > }}}
>
> Hmmm, I think I haven't seen this patch in the HEAD yet.
I haven't seen it anywhere; I think Simon forgot to push it (either that
or I'm just being dopier than normal).
> Is there an automatic way to see which patches
> should still be merged into which direction?
The http://cvs.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/6.6_Branch page describes how
to check that there are no patches in 6.6 only that should be in the
HEAD (although I haven't been actively keeping the list of exceptions
up-to-date; I think it'll be easier to do a bulk update when checking
that the HEAD is not missing anything, as there shouldn't be many new
patches missing from the head, and most of them should be called
"MERGED.*").
For patches in the HEAD that should be in 6.6, the number of exceptions
would make the same system impractical. To make sure a patch doesn't get
missed, open a trac ticket of type "merge" and put the patch name in it.
(Noting that it should be merged in the patch description or sending an
e-mail to ask for it to be merged are also OK, but obviously if I miss
them then there is no easy way of noticing).
Thanks
Ian
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs
