> #1232: unix-compatible interpreter needed for ghc > > Comment: > Aren't you just looking for 'runhaskell', already widely used for this > purpose:
No, Frederik's point is that runhaskell currently insists the file be
named with a .hs or .lhs suffix, and he would like this restriction to
be relaxed.
Regards,
malcolm
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs
