#1319: grammatical mistake in user's guide description of -fwarn-name-shadowing
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: Isaac Dupree | Owner:
Type: bug | Status: reopened
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Documentation | Version: 6.6.1
Severity: trivial | Resolution:
Keywords: | Difficulty: Unknown
Os: Unknown | Testcase:
Architecture: Unknown |
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Changes (by [EMAIL PROTECTED]):
* resolution: fixed =>
* status: closed => reopened
Comment:
Actually, could we just delete this paragraph:
"Consequently, this option does will complain about cyclic recursive
definitions."
It is awkward ("cyclic recursive") and it's only true for "cyclic
recursive definitions" that shadow other names, which
was just explained.
IMHO, the paragraph before this one would be clearer without this
"explanatory" remark. I make this suggestion because
whenever I read this, I have to do a double-take to figure out what is
really meant.
--
Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1319>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs
