#1876: Complete shared library support
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
    Reporter:  simonmar          |        Owner:                    
        Type:  task              |       Status:  new               
    Priority:  high              |    Milestone:  6.10 branch       
   Component:  Compiler          |      Version:  6.8.1             
    Severity:  normal            |   Resolution:                    
    Keywords:                    |   Difficulty:  Difficult (1 week)
    Testcase:                    |           Os:  Unknown/Multiple  
Architecture:  Unknown/Multiple  |  
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Changes (by simonmar):

  * owner:  simonmar =>

Comment:

 Replying to [comment:21 clemens]:
 > Simon, I didn't see any serious attempts to get buildbots going. Iirc I
 fixed "make install" to that extent where regression tests could have been
 run.
 >
 > Also I do not see any reason, how establishing base line quality is
 related to deployment upgrading and installation lifetime issues. If GHC
 doesn't have a way of regression testing shared libs in whatever
 conceptual broken they may be now than GHC will fail to deliver. That's
 simply because shared libs will bitrot in the ongoing development.

 You're right, nothing prevents us from setting up buildbots (except lack
 of time).  But I would really like to have a clear plan of action for
 getting us to the goal of having shared libs deployed.  It's probably not
 difficult, but someone/people need to sit down and seriously think about
 how all this is going to work.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1876#comment:22>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs

Reply via email to