#3339: Data.Monoid: Add (+>) as a synonym for mappend
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: bos | Owner:
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: libraries/base | Version: 6.10.3
Severity: normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Testcase:
Os: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture: Unknown/Multiple
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Comment (by tibbe):
I agree with generalizing (++). Are there any programs that will break
because of that generalization? My argument for reusing (++) is that I'd
like to keep the number of different operators I have to memorize (in
particular when reading other people's code) to a minimum. I only think
very fundamental type classes deserve operators (e.g. Monad, Functor,
Monoid, Num).
--
Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/3339#comment:9>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs
