#836: rebindable if-then-else syntax
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
    Reporter:  nibro              |        Owner:              
        Type:  feature request    |       Status:  new         
    Priority:  normal             |    Milestone:  _|_         
   Component:  Compiler (Parser)  |      Version:  6.13        
    Keywords:                     |     Testcase:  N/A         
   Blockedby:                     |   Difficulty:  Unknown     
          Os:  Unknown/Multiple   |     Blocking:              
Architecture:  Unknown/Multiple   |      Failure:  None/Unknown
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------

Comment(by nibro):

 To clarify my original proposal:

 I want {{{if e then a else b}}} to translate to {{{cond e a b}}} for
 whatever {{{cond}}} is in scope, whatever its type. A pure syntactic
 interpretation, making no semantic considerations whatsoever, exactly as
 simonpj writes in
 [http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/836#comment:6 comment 6].

 I don't want to involve {{{case}}} in this, as I consider {{{case}}} to be
 more primitive. The whole point of the proposal is that {{{if e then a
 else b}}} should ''not'' be equal to
 {{{
 cond e a b = case e of
    True -> a
    False -> b
 }}}
 This should be the default (Prelude) implementation of {{{cond}}}, nothing
 more.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/836#comment:13>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs

Reply via email to