#4510: No  links will be generated to these packages: base-4.3.0.0
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
    Reporter:  claus             |       Owner:              
        Type:  bug               |      Status:  new         
    Priority:  normal            |   Component:  Compiler    
     Version:  7.0.1             |    Keywords:              
    Testcase:                    |   Blockedby:              
          Os:  Windows           |    Blocking:              
Architecture:  Unknown/Multiple  |     Failure:  None/Unknown
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
 As reported earlier, (point 6. in #4292), running haddock (via cabal)
 leads to missing documentation links. This was assumed fixed
 (comment:4:ticket:4292), but apparently not tested - the problem still
 exists (to reproduce, `cabal-install` anything that uses `base` types in
 its documentation, on top of a `7.0.1` windows install, with documentation
 enabled). As I can't see similar failures in hackage build reports, I
 guess the issue is Windows-specific.

 From bug report to guessing at causes:

 My current best bet is the occurrence of unescaped backslashes in
 filepaths in `ghc-pkg` fields (I seem to recall an implicit contract that
 these fields are supposed to be valid Haskell Strings?). As a general
 remark, using forward-slashes seems to be less error-prone.

 Cabal (which generates these warnings, in
 `Distribution/Simple/Haddock.hs`) seems to parse these fields as Haskell
 Strings, and fails when `doesFileExist` can't find the `.haddock`
 interface file.
 {{{
 haddock-interfaces:
 $topdir/../doc/html/libraries/base-4.3.0.0\base.haddock
 }}}
 There are other fields in `ghc-pkg` output that have unescaped backslashes
 in file names (the `*-dirs` family), so apparently the Haskell String
 contract is just my imagination?

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/4510>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs

Reply via email to