#4479: Add Type Directed Name Resolution
----------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
    Reporter:  gidyn                    |        Owner:              
        Type:  feature request          |       Status:  new         
    Priority:  normal                   |    Milestone:  7.2.1       
   Component:  Compiler (Type checker)  |      Version:  6.12.3      
    Keywords:                           |     Testcase:              
   Blockedby:                           |   Difficulty:              
          Os:  Unknown/Multiple         |     Blocking:              
Architecture:  Unknown/Multiple         |      Failure:  None/Unknown
----------------------------------------+-----------------------------------

Comment(by igloo):

 Well, you can do
 {{{
 xs .reverse .(filter isEven) .(map double)
 }}}
 today, without a GHC extension, by defining
 {{{
 x . f = f x
 }}}
 but most people don't.

 In fact, I wonder if adding an `obj.method` style will be a hinderance to
 beginners, as it obscures what type inference can do. For example, if you
 are used to OO-style `mySet.insert`, then it may be less clear (or more
 magical) that an unqualified `empty` can be used for the empty set, with
 the type being inferred from the context.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/4479#comment:8>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs

Reply via email to