Good plan! Ian Lynagh <i...@well-typed.com>: > Hi all, > > Following a recent discussion, we propose to reorganise the GHC-related > mailing lists so that we end up with: > > glasgow-haskell-users > For user discussions > > ghc-devs > For developer discussions > > ghc-commits > For automated commit messages from the git repositories > > ghc-builds > For automated nightly build reports > > ghc-tickets > For automated messages from trac > > We would remove > cvs-ghc cvs-libraries cvs-other glasgow-haskell-bugs > but leave the archives in place, and for now forwarding messages to > cvs-* to ghc-devs, and glasgow-haskell-bugs to ghc-tickets. > (cvs-libraries and cvs-other are included in this list, because we think > they are mainly used by libraries that GHC HQ maintains, or by GHC's > lagging repos of libraries that other people maintain). > > The initial subscriber lists for ghc-devs, ghc-commits and ghc-builds > would be the union of the subscribers of cvs-ghc, cvs-libraries and > cvs-other. For ghc-tickets it would be the subscriber list for > glasgow-haskell-bugs. > > Does that sound reasonable? Does anyone have any further questions or > comments? > > > Thanks > Ian > > > _______________________________________________ > Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list > glasgow-haskell-us...@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list Glasgow-haskell-bugs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs