On Thu, Oct 28, 1999 at 04:29:51 -0700, Simon Marlow wrote:
> We at GHC HQ have just upgraded our remaining glibc 2.0 machine here to
> glibc 2.1, so at least we'll have fewer compatibility problems. But that
> means we won't be able to build glibc 2.0 binaries from now on: is this
> going to cause anyone severe grief?
I'm still supporting packages of GHC and Happy for Debian/glibc-2.0 (a.k.a.
`Slink'). The latest publicly available one is from 1999/09/16...
If there is demand, I'd be willing to provide plain tarballs, too.
Just bug me enough... :-)
Cheers,
Michael
--
Those who open their minds too far often let their brains fall out.
Those who open their minds too far often let their brains fall out.
Those who open their minds too far often let their braGeneral Protection Fault
in msborg32.dll.
