Libor Skarvada, you wrote:
>
> > > infixr 0 `foo`
> > > infixr 0 `bar`
>
> I do not see any problem here.
[...]
> But if we mix the associativity like
> infixl 0 `foo`
> infixr 0 `bar`
> then the parsing of the expression above is not unique, and eg. Hugs
> complains
> ERROR "tmp.hs" (line 7): Ambiguous use of operator "foo" with "bar"
Ah. Thank you for reading my mind.
Now why can't ghc and Hugs do that? ;-) ;-)
Sorry about that. (I really should think a bit harder before mailing
this list, lest I make a habit of looking really silly...)
--
Fergus Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | "I have always known that the pursuit
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | of excellence is a lethal habit"
PGP: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
