In addition to my previous note on the implementation of minimum and
the like, could you also revise the List.sort implementation?
For example, the merge sorting, it is 100 times cheaper on
sort [1..6000]
than what shows ghc-4.02.
And again, i was forced to hide the ghc `sort'.
The merge sorting costs O( n*log(n) ), so it is good in any case.
Why not implement it?
------------------
Sergey Mechveliani
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: `sort' implementation S.D.Mechveliani
- RE: `sort' implementation Simon Marlow
- Re: `sort' implementation Carl R. Witty
