> That's what you get with unsafePerformIO; we've even > added a {-# NOINLINE blockingSem #-} pragma for exactly this reason. > (Doubtless undocumented.) ahem. Quote from the 4.02 documentation at http://research.microsoft.com/users/t-simonm/ghc/Docs/latest/users_guide/use rs_guide-4.html#ss4.2 "Incedentally, there's also a NOINLINE pragma which does the obvious thing." :-) (And the current documentation in the CVS tree has full descriptions of all the various pragmas). Simon
- Q: Threads in GHC's RTS Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Threads in GHC's RTS Herbert Graeber
- Re: Q: Threads in GHC's RTS Sven Panne
- Re: Q: Threads in GHC's RTS Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- RE: Q: Threads in GHC's RTS Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: Q: Threads in GHC's RTS Sven Panne
- RE: Q: Threads in GHC's RTS Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor)
- Re: Q: Threads in GHC's RTS Sven Panne
- RE: Q: Threads in GHC's RTS Simon Marlow
- RE: Q: Threads in GHC's RTS Simon Marlow
- RE: Q: Threads in GHC's RTS Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor)
- RE: Q: Threads in GHC's RTS Simon Peyton-Jones
- RE: Q: Threads in GHC's RTS Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor)
- Re: Q: Threads in GHC's RTS Sven Panne
- RE: Q: Threads in GHC's RTS Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: Q: Threads in GHC's RTS Sven Panne