Thomas Hallgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > "Manuel M. T. Chakravarty" wrote: > > > Some mail readers have a summary > > mode that shows only some 20 characters of the subject line. > > For this reason, I think you should not add a tag at > all. I don't think this is necessary. The presence of > "glasgow-haskell-users" in the To: or CC: field is quite > enough to allow a mail filter to put all mail to the list > in a separate folder. I set up a filter like this when I > joined the list, and it has worked fine since then, even > though the domain part of the address has changed... But I (and maybe others) don't like mail filters that file away mailing lists. I prefer to have everything in a single inbox and visual "scan" it myself. Therefore, a short tag is actually quite useful - but it should be short (that was my point). Manuel PS: Interesting is that my first message on this subject took 6 days to make it through the mailing list's mailer...
Re: Mailing list (was: Re: Q: Threads in GHC's RTS)
Manuel M. T. Chakravarty Tue, 20 Apr 1999 03:16:56 +0200 (MET DST)
- Mailing list (was: Re: Q: Threads in GHC's RTS) Keith Wansbrough
- Mailing list (was: Re: Q: Threads in GHC's R... Barbara Nostrand
- RE: Mailing list (was: Re: Q: Threads in GHC... Simon Marlow
- Re: Mailing list (was: Re: Q: Threads in GHC... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Mailing list (was: Re: Q: Threads in GHC... Thomas Hallgren
- RE: Mailing list (was: Re: Q: Threads in... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- RE: Mailing list (was: Re: Q: Threads in GHC... Simon Marlow
- RE: Mailing list (was: Re: Q: Threads in GHC... Frank A. Christoph
- Mail list archives (was: Re: Mailing lis... Michael Hobbs