> Just a few remarks and personal opinions from a RPM builder's view: > > * IMHO the whole /usr/local hierarchy is completely obsolete for > and "real" programs should only be used for quick local hacks. > => GHC should reside under /usr/{bin,lib,include} I'd rather say that the use of /usr/local is system dependent. The BSD folks for example have a nice clear scheme: everything in /usr is part of the base system, everything in /usr/local comes from the ports tree. In a package system the choice of installation directories is moot, as you point out. The only issue is whether several versions are allowed to co-exist. Either choice seems reasonable to me. Cheers, Simon
- GHC include files George Russell
- Re: GHC include files Michael Weber
- RE: GHC include files Simon Marlow
- Re: GHC include files Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: GHC include files Keith Wansbrough
- Re: GHC include files Malcolm Wallace
- RE: GHC include files Simon Marlow
- RE: GHC include files Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: GHC include files Sven Panne
- Re: GHC include files George Russell
- Re: GHC include files Simon Marlow
- Re: GHC include files Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: GHC include files George Russell
- Re: GHC include files Sven Panne
- Re: GHC include files George Russell
- Re: GHC include files Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: GHC include files Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: GHC include files George Russell
- Re: GHC include files Manuel M. T. Chakravarty