Simon Marlow wrote:
> You're suggesting removing this function? Again, I've no objection (because
> I don't use it :-) but it's harder to make a case for removing something
> from a library. In this case, recvFrom is the dual of sendTo, so it at
> least looks consistent. I agree it's hard to imagine a situation where you
> might use it.
Any chance of first introducing a Java style "deprecated" flag (it could
be specified in the same way as inline) so that you can give people some warning
before removing things?
