Simon Marlow wrote: > The patch below causes a reschedule after a putMVar has woken a thread. It > helps the program above, and maybe it's the right thing to do in general - > opinions? If it makes such putMVars much more expensive I'm against it.
- Simple concurrent issue? Hannah Schroeter
- RE: Simple concurrent issue? Simon Marlow
- Re: Simple concurrent issue? George Russell
- Re: Simple concurrent issue? Kevin Glynn
- RE: Simple concurrent issue? Simon Marlow