Wed, 23 May 2001 16:50:42 +1000, Manuel M. T. Chakravarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> I think, having the third point is good, because the Haskell
> report requires that
>
> Computation exitWith code terminates the program,
> returning code to the program's caller.
Well, it says also that
Actions, however, must be ordered in a well-defined manner for
program execution -- and I/O in particular -- to be meaningful.
Haskell 's I/O monad provides the user with a way to specify the
sequential chaining of actions, and an implementation is obliged
to preserve this order.
which is not true in a threaded program.
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk * [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/
\__/
^^ SYGNATURA ZASTĘPCZA
QRCZAK
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
